Welcome to the
MIRATECH Solutions Guide

MIRATECH is the expert in providing fully integrated, proven exhaust compliance solutions for anyone using industrial engines in a Power Generation, Gas Compression and Mechanical Drives.

Review
Your Solution
Contact us for
Pricing & Details
continue

Tell us about your needs

Your selction did not return any results.
Please adjust your selection and try again.

Applications

  1. Gas Compression
  2. Power Generation
  3. Rail
  4. NESHAP Regulations
  5. Industrial
  6. Air Compression
  7. Liquids Pumping
  8. Bio-Gas
  9. Greenhouse CO2 Enrichment
  10. Industrial Marine

Engine Type

  1. Bi-Fuel Diesel and Natural Gas
  2. Diesel
  3. Natural Gas Lean Burn
  4. Natural Gas Rich Burn

Noise Control

  1. Yes
  2. No

Engine Size

  1. 20 to 200 hp
  2. 200 to 1350 hp
  3. 1350 to 10,000 hp
  4. 10,000 hp and above

Regulated Pollutants

  1. NOx
  2. NO2
  3. CO
  4. VOC (NMNEHC)
  5. HAP's
  6. Particulate Matter (PM)
RESET
 
continue

Submit your Request for Pricing and Details

Your Solution(s):

Contact Information

Error: Please complete form.


Thank You!
back
submit

EPA proposes changes in how clean air cost accounting rules are written.

June 19, 2020

On June 4, 2020 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced a proposed overhaul of how major clean air rules are written by changing the cost-benefit analysis process, a move that would affect the stringency of future regulations according to a June 4, 2020 Reuters report.United States Environmental Protection Agency

The new proposed cost-benefit analysis would focus on weighing only the economic impact of a proposed rule without taking into account possible benefits such as public health to justify expanding regulations, as has previously been done, EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler said.

Wheeler said the agency would calculate “co-benefits” separately and publish it for the public, but that calculation cannot be used to underpin the rule.

The proposal aims to correct what Wheeler described in a statement as a “dishonest accounting method the previous administration used to justify costly, ineffective regulations.”

In April, Wheeler withdrew the legal justification for an Obama-era rule that forced coal-fired power plants to cut their mercury emissions saying the cost of compliance far outweighed the public health benefits.

He said at the time that the Obama administration took into account other factors when justifying its mercury rule, such as the co-benefits of reducing particulate matter and other harmful substances that come out of smokestacks. He said a benefit-cost analysis should be limited to the main pollutant a rule is meant to address.

The decades-old federal Clean Air Act contains language on the consideration of benefits and costs, Wheeler said told reporters that there has not been an effort to ensure that benefits and costs are done consistently across the agency.

Environmental groups slammed the proposal for weakening how rules would be made going forward to protect vulnerable communities that feel the direct impacts of air pollution.

What this means to you
The Environmental Protection Agency is proposing an overhaul of how major clean air rules are written by changing the cost-benefit analysis. The new proposed cost-benefit analysis would focus on weighing only the economic impact of a proposed rule without taking into account possible benefits such as public health to justify expanding regulations, as has previously been done.

MIRATECH can help
Contact MIRATECH for emission control solutions for stationary engines.