Welcome to the
MIRATECH Solutions Guide

MIRATECH is the expert in providing fully integrated, proven exhaust compliance solutions for anyone using industrial engines in a Power Generation, Gas Compression and Mechanical Drives.

Review
Your Solution
Contact us for
Pricing & Details
continue

Tell us about your needs

Your selction did not return any results.
Please adjust your selection and try again.

Applications

  1. Gas Compression
  2. Power Generation
  3. Rail
  4. NESHAP Regulations
  5. Industrial
  6. Air Compression
  7. Liquids Pumping
  8. Bio-Gas
  9. Greenhouse CO2 Enrichment
  10. Industrial Marine

Engine Type

  1. Bi-Fuel Diesel and Natural Gas
  2. Diesel
  3. Natural Gas Lean Burn
  4. Natural Gas Rich Burn

Noise Control

  1. Yes
  2. No

Engine Size

  1. 20 to 200 hp
  2. 200 to 1350 hp
  3. 1350 to 10,000 hp
  4. 10,000 hp and above

Regulated Pollutants

  1. NOx
  2. NO2
  3. CO
  4. VOC (NMNEHC)
  5. HAP's
  6. Particulate Matter (PM)
RESET
 
continue

Submit your Request for Pricing and Details

Your Solution(s):

Contact Information

Error: Please complete form.


Thank You!
back
submit

Federal court orders EPA to act on Connecticut air pollution petition.

February 27, 2018

On February 7, 2018 a Federal Court ordered the Trump administration to take action on a request from Connecticut’s government to crack down on pollution from a Pennsylvania power plant. Connecticut federal Judge Warren Eginton gave the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 30 days to hold a public hearing on the state’s request and 60 days to make a final decision according to this report from The Hill.

The judge said that the EPA clearly violated the 60-day time limit for responding to such petitions under the Clean Air Act and rejected the agency’s request to take until the end of the year to decide.

“Agency compliance more than two years after the filing of the petition is clearly at odds with period of time that Congress deemed appropriate for EPA review of a Section 126(b) petition,” Eginton wrote, referring to a section of the Clean Air Act.

“Defendants’ proposed schedule contravenes the congressional intent that EPA ‘act quickly on a Section 126(b) petition,’” he continued.

Connecticut filed the petition in June 2016.

Officials said the coal-fired Brunner Island Steam Electric Station in southern Pennsylvania is emitting nitrogen oxides that blow to Connecticut and deteriorate the air quality there. The state asked the EPA to force the plant to reduce its emissions.

The Obama administration’s EPA extended the deadline for responding to the petition to January 2017. The EPA told the federal court that its staff is working on the petition, but they also have other responsibilities that require attention.

Numerous states have sued the EPA under the Trump administration for not responding to their petitions to crack down on pollution, like Maryland, Delaware and New York.

What this means to you
A Federal Court ordered the Trump EPA to hold a public hearing on Connecticut’s June 2016 request to crack down on pollution from Pennsylvania within 30 days – and to make a final decision within 60 days. The judge said EPA clearly violated the 60-day time limit for responding to such petitions under the Clean Air Act and rejected the agency’s request to take until the end of the year to decide.

MIRATECH can help
Contact MIRATECH for stationary engine emission compliance solutions.